01/13/2023 / By Ethan Huff
The establishment’s laughably failed attempt to push a monkeypox pandemic hoax following the collapse of the covid pandemic hoax produced a hilarious study claiming that women contract monkeypox just like men do – except for the fact that nearly half of the study’s “women” were actually biological men.
Published in the once-reputable journal The Lancet, the study was conducted for the apparent purpose of scaring everyone, regardless of their sex, about monkeypox. After it became abundantly obvious that primarily homosexual men contract it, the goal was to spread fear among both genders.
In order to do this, researchers compiled a participation pool that comprised of 47 percent transgender “women,” meaning men in drag who may or may not have male genitalia. These men, we are told, constitute “women” for the purposes of progressive science.
“There were 62 ‘trans women,’ 69 [real] women, and 5 non-binary individuals who were grouped with the [real] women to form a category of ‘people assigned female at birth,'” reported The Post Millennial about how the study was constructed.
In the end, both the real women and the fake women developed “anogenital lesions … reflective of sexual practices: vulvovaginal lesions predominated in cis women and non-binary individuals and anorectal features predominated in trans women.”
In other words, real women develop monkeypox according to their genitalia while fake women develop it according to theirs. This is not rocket science, but this is also what passes for “science” in the West in 2023. (Related: Monkeypox is a “gay” disease.)
This is the same The Lancet that published a now-retracted fake science paper about covid back in 2020. The journal’s editors are apparently hellbent on destroying what little credibility remains for the publication.
Meanwhile, the rest of the world looks on in horror and perhaps amusement at the absolute insanity of “progressive” ideology, which seemingly becomes crazier by the day.
“This is a bizarre study,” tweeted researcher Maya Forstater. “It concludes ‘The clinical features of monkeypox in women and non-binary individuals were similar to those described in men’ – (but) 47% of the women were male.”
“It is hardly surprising they had clinical features similar to men,” she further jested about the lunacy of this study.
As is probably one of their goals, the leftists behind this study are undermining the public’s trust in the medical world by publishing this tripe in the first place.
“Same people doing these studies are the folks angry that people are not trusting medical authorities and consuming ‘misinformation,'” tweeted Jeremy Carl, a senior fellow at the Claremont Institute.
Many others on Twitter rightfully criticized the study and its authors for using derogatory and offensive terms like “cis” and “assigned female at birth” to describe real women.
“I doubt all the science in that journal when words like ‘non-binary,’ ‘trans,’ and ‘cis’ are used,” one of them wrote.
This would hardly be the first time that The Lancet has used such grotesque terms. In its September issue from last year, the journal degradingly described real women as “bodies with vaginas.”
The issue itself was grotesque all on its own as it centered around the concept of “Periods on display” and what it described as “the cultural movement against menstrual shame and #PeriodPoverty.”
Real women everywhere are growing weary of all this derogatory bashing of their personhood. Some of them formed a protest recently outside The Lancet‘s London office, a video clip of which you can watch below:
#HearMeRoar shame on the Lancet pic.twitter.com/H1ZFIuXOPe
— Lily Maynard (@LilyLilyMaynard) October 8, 2021
More news about the latest scamdemics being pushed by the globalists can be found at Hoax.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
absurd, gay mafia, gender, gender confused, identity politics, left cult, lunatics, men, men's health, monkeypox, research, science deception, science fraud, The Lancet, transgender, women, women's health
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 JUNK SCIENCE WATCH